Before you start to read this post, please read the following definition of slander:
As you research more on the leaders of the A’ole GMO movement, you start to find a lot of discrepancies in what they say and do. It’s all documented front and center on the internet and somehow changes in emails. Note this email from Russell Ruderman on his credentials of his degree:
Okay, if he has his genetics degree, when exactly did he get it? What does the research on him say:
He got his degree nearly 40 years ago! The technology now and then is so advanced and I can’t imagine that he has kept up with it. He’s been running his Islands Naturals Deli and Market for several decades already. Is pumping up your science credentials going to affect my opinion of you? Why didn’t he just say that he has a BS in Biology to begin with in his email instead of being coy about it?
And about that Right to Know campaign bit…
**If you plan on commenting on this post as being slanderous, the evidence is presented and received from the source himself. How is your own presentation of yourself with discrepancies slanderous?**